Bioremediation of contaminated lands: modern Ukrainian technologies and global approaches
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the risks of industrial runoff pollution of land resources of Ukraine, and to analyze global approaches.The following methods were used to conduct the study: systematization of the material, scientific generalization, comparison. They allowed to identify and understand the spatial differentiation and diversity of factors that influence the state of land resources in different natural and socio-economic conditions; to systematize and generalize the risks that arise during the use of bioremediation. The article analyzes various methods of chemical analysis of soils to determine the content of organic pollutants and their metabolites in the soil, in particular, methods of GC, chromatography-mass spectrometry.Research results. The article analyzes the average indicators of permissible concentrations of harmful substances in the soil in Ukraine and the world. The analysis shows that the application of cleaning methods, such as bioremediation using biological preparations, is effective for Ukrainian soils. The data obtained emphasize the needfor further research into monitoring the state of the soil to ensure environmental safety. The sources analyzed in the article provide extensive information about chemicals, their impact on land pollution, as well as methods for studying and monitoring their concentrations in soils.A review of recent literature has shown the effectiveness of the biological preparation «Bakoyl-KZ» for the biological remediation of oil-contaminated soils. The main active components of this preparation are specific strains of microorganisms, such as Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Microbacterium lacticum, and Arthrobacter terregens.These microorganisms have high oil-oxidizing activity, which allows them to effectively decompose hydrocarbons present in petroleum products.
References
2. UNEP Environmental Impact of Transport on Soil Pollution in Unique Natural Areas. United Nations Environment Programme. 2020.
3. Brown J. Smith R. Soil Pollution from Transport Accidents. Journal of Environmental Protection. 2015. Vol. 10(5). P. 200–210.
4. Zhanar Kassenova, Yeldos Iskakov, Bolat Yermagambet, Bauyrzhan Kapsalyamov, Mezgil Saulebekova, Dina Imbayeva, Maira Kazankapova1 and Dariga Nasyrova. Effectiveness of Oil-Contaminated Soil Reclamation with Humic Preparations. International Journal of Agriculture and Biosciences. 2024. Vol. 13(3). P. 474–487. https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.ijab/2024.154.
5. Kapsalyamov B., Tuyak S., Kassenova Zh., Yermagambet B., Kazankapova M. Innovative ways to clean oil contaminated soil. XIII international scientific conference. Tallinn. Estonia. 23-24.05.2024. P. 85-92.
6. Onerkhan G., Durmekbaeva Sh., Akhmetova N. Bioindi cation of water quality of Lake Zeran using micro seaweed. Polish journal of science. 2019. № 19, Vol.1. P. 7 11.
7. Өnerkhan G., Skipin L., Badelgazhy E., Zhumay E., Syz dykov E. Mұnay өnіmderіmen lastanғan topyraқty bioreme diatsiyalau. KazUTB. 2023. Vol. 4. No. 21. (In. Kaz.)
8. Wang X. Bioassays for assessing phytotoxicity in conta minated soils. Environmental Pollution. 2014. Vol. 189. P. 208–214.
9. Xu X., Zhou Z. The impacts of tourism on soil properties and the environment in Mediterranean areas. Geosciences. 2020. Vol. 10(6). P. 221.
10. Leung E., Yang A. Sustainability in tourism practices and its impact on soil conservation. International Journal of Tourism Research. 2021. Vol. 23(4). P. 845–859.
11. Mench M. Successes and limitations of phytotechnologies at field scale: outcomes, assessment and outlook from COST Action 859. Journal of Soils and Sediments. 2010. № 10. Р. 1039–1070.
12. Vasilyeva G., Kondrashina V., Strijakova E., Ortega- Calvo J-J. Adsorptive bioremediation of soil highly contaminated with crude oil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020. 706, No135739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135739
13. WFD CIS Guidance Document No. 2. Identification of Water Bodies. Published by the Directorate General Environment of the European Commission, Brussels. 2003. ISBN No. 92-894-5122-X, ISSN No. 1725-1087.
14. WFD CIS Guidance Document No. 9. Implementing the Geographical Information System Elements (GIS) of the Water Framework Directive. Published by the Directorate General Environment of the European Commission, Brussels. 2002. ISBN No. 92- 94-5129-7, ISSN No. 1725-1087.
15. Строкаль В. П., Шевчук С. А. Затоплення та під- топлення територій : ризики для водної та продовольчої безпеки регіонального рівня. Екологічні науки. 2023. № 4(49). С. 159-170. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2023.eco.4-49.21.
16. Strokal V., Kurovska A., Strokal M. More river pollution from untreated urban waste due to the Russian- Ukrainian war: a perspective view. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences. 2023. Vol. 20, No. 1. Р. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2023.2281920.
17. Cheng F., Liu J. Soil pollution in ecologically sensitive regions: The role of tourism in soil contamination. Envi ronmental Geochemistry and Health. 2022. Vol. 44(2).
18. Alloway B. J. Sources of heavy metals and metalloids in soils. Heavy metals in soils: trace metals and metalloids in soils and their bioavailability. 2013. P. 11-50.
19. UNEP World Tourism Organization’s Report on Tourism and Sustainability. United Nations Environment Programme. 2017.
20. Cummings C., Lee H. Impact of tourism on soil degradation. Journal of Environmental Science. 2021. Vol. 59(4). P. 351–358.
21. Zhang X., Lin Z. Evaluation of tourist-induced soil pollution in coastal zones. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2016. Vol. 113(1–2). P. 356–362.
22. Liang H., Wang Y. Climate change and tourism: Addressing the environmental costs of tourism activities. Tourism Management Perspectives. 2020. Vol. 34. P. 100668.
23. Zhang S., Wang Z. Bioaccumulation of pollutants in soil: The effects of tourism on soil health. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 2021. Vol. 67(4). P. 253–262.
