MODERN ASPECTS OF SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF ECONOMY OF NITROGEN FERTILIZERS DURING SOYBEAN GROWING UNDER IRRIGATION
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of our research was to determine the peculiarity of the formation of bubbles on soybean roots in a layer of 0–20 cm and their effect on seed yield depend-ing on the density of plant standing against the back-ground of the use of various doses of nitrogen fertilizers. Research methods: field, laboratory, statistical. Results. It was found that when soybean crops were thickened, fewer bubbles were formed on plants with a lower mass. But due to the increase in the density of standing plants, the formation of bubbles per 1 ha of seeding and their mass increased at different food backgrounds. Also, studies have found that increasing the content of soluble nitrogen-containing compounds in the field with the intro-duction of N60 does not prevent their symbiosis with nod-ule bacteria. Indicators of the best activity of the sym-biotic process were obtained at a plant stand density of 600 thousand units/ha, while the maximum yield of soy-bean seeds was formed. It was determined that the abil-ity of soybean plants to absorb nitrogen is inversely pro-portional to high summer air temperatures. Findings. As the density of soybean crops increases, fewer bubbles are formed on plants with a lower mass. But due to the higher density of plant standing, the formation of the number of bubbles per hectare and their mass increased – 225 g, 261 g-against the background of N30 and N60, respectively. The maximum mass of bubbles, 0,36 and 0,37 g/plant, equal to 216–222 kg/ha is formed in variants with the intro-duction of N30 and N60 at a plant density of 600 thousand units/ha. By regulating the density of standing soybean plants, it is possible to significantly influence the formation of nitrogen-fixing capacity of plants.
References
2. Нагорний В.І., Романько Ю.А. Агротехнічне значення та роль сої в екологізації сільськогосподарського виробни-цтва. Вісник Сумського НАУ. 2009. Вип. 11 (18). С. 79–83.
3. Duke S., Collins M. Role of potassium in legume dinitrogen fixation. Potassium in Agriculture. Madison : American Society of Agronomy, 1985. Р. 443–465.
4. Звездичев В.В., Шерстнев С.С. Без зерно-бобовых не обойтись, и без сои в частности. Зерновое хозяйство. 2002. № 3. С. 14–15.
5. 5.Біологічний азот : монографія / за ред. В.П. Патики. Київ : Світ, 2003. 424 с.
6. Bohlool B., Ladha J., Garrity D., George T. Biological nitrogen fixation for sustainable agriculture: A perspective. Plant and Soil. 1992. Vol. 141. Iss. 1–2. P. 1–11.
7. Furseth B., Conle Sh., Ane J. Soybean Responseo Soil Rhizobia and Seed-applied Rhizobia Inoculants in Wisconsin. Crop Science. 2012. Vol. 52. No. 1. P. 339–344.
8. Адамень Ф.Ф. Эффективность инокуляции сои. Симферополь : Таврида, 1995. 42 с.
9. Gan Y., Stulen I., H. van Keulen, Kuiper P. Low concentrations of nitrateand ammonium stimulate nodulation and N2 fixation while inhibiting specific nodulation (nodule DWg-1 root dry weight) and specific N2 fixation (N2 fixed g1 root dry weight) in soybean. Plant and Soil. 2004. Vol. 258. Iss. 1. P. 281–292.