DEGREE OF PHENOTYPIC DOMINANCE OF QUANTITATIVE FEATURES IN HULLESS BARLEY F1 HYBRIDS
Abstract
Determining the pattern of inheritance of quantitative features is the basis for successful plant breeding. The purpose of the work is to establish indicators of phenotypic dominance of quantitative features in the system of diallel crossings of spring hulless barley varieties in the conditions of the Northern Forest Steppe of Ukraine. Methods. Research was conducted on the creation and study of hybrids F1 of 7 varieties of spring hulless barley in the system of diallel crossings. Hybrids and parent forms were analyzed by plant height, total tillering, productive tillering, spike length, kernel number per spike, grain weight per spike, grain weight per plant, weight of 1000 grains. Inheritance of productivity and its structural elements in hybrids F1 of spring hulless grain barley was determined by the degree of phenotypic dominance (hp) of traits. Results. The results of research indicate that the nature of inheritance of plant height and elements of spring hulless barley productivity is quite complex and manifests itself in various genotypeenvironment interactions. Crossing combinations with the manifestation of positive dominance and heterosis over 2 years of research have been identified, which can be of practical breeding value for combining productivity traits in hybrid populations of spring hulless barley. Conclusions. When breeding for lodging resistance by the hybridization method, it is possible to use the low-growing variety Natair as a component of crossing. A significant increase in mass of 1000 grains was found in crossbreeding combinations with the Kozatskyi variety, which may indicate its donor properties in selection to increase grain size. Alamo / Roseland combination was identified with a stable level of heterosis over the years in terms of grain weight per spike, and positive dominance and overdominance in kernel number per spike.
References
2. Fawzia Bouchetat, Abdelkader Aissat. Evaluation of the genetic determinism of an F1 generation of barley resulting from a complete diallel cross between autochthones and introduced cultivars, Heliyon. 2019, Vol. 5, Issue 11, e02744, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. heliyon.2019.e02744.
3. Akgun N., Topal A. Regression analysis of grain weight per plant in barley crosses. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2011, Vol. 17, (No 6), P. 773–776.
4. Dyulgerov N., Dyulgerova B. Variability, heritability, and correlations among grain yield and related traits in hulless barley accessions. Trakia Journal of Sciences. 2020, Vol. 18, № 4, P. 285–293. doi: 10.15547/ tjs.2020.04.002
5. Yadav S.K., Singh A.K., Pandey P., Singh, S. Genetic variability and direct selection criterion for seed yield in segregating generations of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2015, 6, P. 1543–1549. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ ajps.2015.69153
6. Васько Н.І., Солонечний П.М., Солонечна О.В. Ступінь домінантності у F1 ячменю від схрещування з голозерними сортами. Світові рослинні ресурси: стан та перспективи розвитку: матеріали V Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції (7 червня 2019 р., м. Київ), 2019. С. 18–21.
7. Aghamiri S., Mostafavi K., Mohammadi A. Genetic study of agronomic traits in barley based diallel cross analysis. Adv. Environ. Biol. 2012, 6, P. 62–68.
8. Varzaru S., Ciulca S. Analysis of gene effects for grains traits in winter barley. Journal of Horticulture, Forestry and Biotechnology. 2013, Vol. 17(2), P. 299–302.
9. Компанець К.В., Козаченко М.Р. Успадкування продуктивності та її структурних елементів у F1 гібридів ячменю ярого. Генетичні ресурси рослин. 2017, № 20. С. 43–55.
10. Zymogliad O.V., Kozachenko M.R., Vasko N.I., Solonechnyi P.M., Vazhenina O.E., Naumov O.G. Performance inheritance and combining ability of spring barley accessions. Селекція і насінництво. 2021, Вип. 119. С. 106–116. doi: https://doi. org/10.30835/2413-7510.2021.237026
11. Johnson G.F., Whittington W.J. Inheritance of yield components and yield in relation to evidence for heterosis in F1 barley hybrids. Euphytica. 1978, 27, P. 587–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043186
12. Лисенко, А.А., Гудзенко В.М. Комбінаційна здатність та успадкування пов’язаних з урожайністю ознак в F1 ячменю озимого в умовах Лісостепу України. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. 2023. 18 (4), P. 251–261. https://doi. org/10.21498/2518-1017.18.4.2022.273986
13. Eshghi R., Akhundova E. Genetic analysis of grain yield and some agronomic traits in hulless barley. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2009, Vol. 4(12), P. 1464–1474.
14. Eshghi, R., E. Akhundova. Inheritance of some important agronomic traits in hulless barley. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2010, 12, P. 73–76.
15. Beil G. M., Atkins R. E. Inheritance of quantitative characters in grain sorgum. Iowa State Journal. 1965, Vol. 39. 3 p.
16. Griffing B. Analysis of quantitative gene-action by constant parent regression and related techniques. Genetics. 1950, Vol. 35. P. 303–321.
17. Кузьменко Є.А., Хоменко С.О., Федоренко М.В. Ступінь фенотипового домінування ознак продуктивності у гібридів першого покоління пшениці твердої ярої. Миронівський вісник. 2018, Вип. 7, С. 54–67.