CONTAMINATION MONITORING OF AGROPHYTOCENOSIS OF GRAIN CULTURES BY WEED SEEDS
Abstract
Contamination monitoring of agrocenosis is main is a basis for successful protection of agricultural crops. Global climatic changes and weather changes effect on weed’s component of agrophytocenosis. During the last years we can see the tendency of spreading and appearing more weeds. Agrothechnical measures, soil peculiarities, locations, density of plants, condition the adapting of the weeds in the agrophytocenosis, which decreases the effect of adding fertilizers, increases the material spending and methods of plants protections. Thus, the soil agrocenosis contamination by big amount of weeds is actual problem for the whole agricultural production. Looking at the results of our research, we can say that the biggest amount of seeds in the soil accumulated Spergula avensis L. – 48.7 seeds in 0–20 cm layer of soil per the 40 square centimeters. The population of Polygonum convolvulus L., Polygonum lapathifolium L. and Chenopodium album L. are contaminating the soil slightly 9.9–10.1 seeds per the 40 square centimeters. In the agrophytocenosis of winter cereals the biggest population was C. album – 61.5 seeds. The seeds of S. arvensis 21.2 seeds per the 40 square centimeters was the second biggest population. In the crops of spring cereals we could see the tendency of decreasing weeds in the deeper layers of soil from 49.9 seeds/at the 40 square centimeters up to 12.3 seeds/ per the 40 square centimeters, while under the crops of the winter cereals the most contaminated was 15–20 cm layer – 41,5 seeds/per the 40 square centimeters. From the main reserve the weeds 79.5–81.7% are the seeds of minor weeds and 10.8–7.1% are the seeds of perennial types. From the group of minor weeds the biggest amount of seeds in the soil were characterized the populations of C. album – 45.8%. The amount of perennial weeds in the general structure of the crops contamination of the grain cultures was not big from 1 to 5 seeds per the 40 square centimeters. Thus, big amount of the weeds in the agrophytocenosis – 265.3–335.5 millions per hectare, is very dynamic at the same time- it constantly refreshes by means of fructification of the weeds, but at the same time the part of the seeds is used for germination, the other part dies, the other plants exude in the process of crops care. That’s why the on time made complex of agrotechnical measures determines the level of actual agrocenosis contamination.
References
2. Bewket Getachew Bekele. Review on Characterstics, Causes and Factors that affect Crop Weed Competition. GSJ: Volume 10, Issue 2, February 2022, 317–333. Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal. com.
3. Борисенко В. І., Руденко Ю. А. Вплив системи обробітку ґрунту на кількісний та видовий склад насіння бур’янів на землях, виведених з використання. Міністерство освіти та науки. Житомирський національний агроекологічний університет. Агрономічний факультет. 2019. 17 с. http://www. zelena.org.ua/sites/default/files/field/file/zbirnyk_ konf._ pnu_cherven_ 2019_r.pdf#page=18.
4. Cesar Tiago Forte, Leandro Galon, Amauri Nelson Beutler, Felipe José Menin Basso, Felipe Nonemacher, Francisco Wilson Reichert Júnior, Gismael Francisco Perin, Siumar Pedro Tironi. Soil management systems and their effect on the weed seed bank. Pesq. agropec. bras., Brasília, v.53, n.4, p. 435–442, Apr. 2018. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-204X2018000400005.
5. Chauhan B. S. Grand challenges in weed management. Front. Agron. 2020, 1, 3.
6. Cimalova, S.; Lososova, Z. Arable weed vegetation of the northeastern part of the Czech Republic: Effects of environmental factors on species composition. Plant Ecol. 2009, 203, 45–57.
7. Dmitriev, P. A., Kozlovsky, B. L., Kupriushkin, D. P., Dmitrieva, A. A., Rajput, V. D., Chokheli, V. A., Tarik, E. P., Kapralova, O. A., Tokhtar, V. K., Minkina, T. M. Assessment of Invasive and Weed Species by Hyperspectral Imagery in Agrocenoses Ecosystem. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2442. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102442 https://www. mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing).
8. Dorado, J., Del Monte, J.P., López-Fando C. Weed seedbank response to crop rotation and tillage in semiarid agroecosystems. Weed Sci. 1999, 47, 67–73.
9. Du Croix Sissons, M. J., Van Acker R. C., Derksen D. A., Thomas, A. G. Depth of seedling recruitment of five weed species measured in situ in conventional and zerotillage fields.Weed Sci. 48, 327–332.
10. Elkhouly A. R., Slama A. T., Al Hireereeq E. A. Survey of Global Crop Loss. Balance J. Appl. Humanit. 2021, 2, 9–19.
11. Feledyn-Szewczyk B., Smagacz J., Kwiatkowski C. A., Harasim E., Wozniak A. Weed Flora and Soil Seed Bank Composition as Affected by Tillage System in Three-Year Crop Rotation. Agriculture. 2020, 10(5), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriculture10050186.
12. Fried G., Norton L. R., Reboud X. Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 128, 68–76.
13. Grundy, A. C., Mead A., Bond W. Modelling the effect of weed-Seed distribution in the soil profile on seedling emergence. Weed Res. 1996, 36, 375–384.
14. Іващенко О. О. Бур’яни в агрофітоценозах. Світ. Київ. 2001. 235 с.
15. Jabran, K., Mahmood, K., Melander, B., Bajwa, A.A., Kudsk, P. Weed dynamics and management in wheat. Adv. Agron. 2017, 145, 97–166
16. Kleijn D. Species richness and weed abundance in the vegetation of arable field boundaries. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, 177. 17. Koller . Techniques of Soil Tillage, in Soil Tillage in Agroecosystems; Titi, A.E., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003, 1–25.
18. Корпіта Г. М., Шувар Ш. Ф., Дудар О. О. Захист посівів картоплі від бур’янів в умовах західного Лісостепу. Вісник Львівського національного аграрного універ- ситету. Агрономія. 24(2020). С. 159–162.
19. Krawczyk R., Kubsik K., Mrówczyński M., Kaczmarek S. Effect of soil variation and soil tillage systems on soil weed seedbank. Prog. Plant Prot./Post. Ochr. Roślin 2008, 48, 276–280.
20. Kubiak A., Wolna-Maruwka A., Niewiadomska A., Pilarska A. А. The Problem of Weed Infestation of Agricultural Plantations vs. the Assumptions of the European Biodiversity Strategy. Agronomy 2022, 12(8), 1808; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12081808.
21. Martyniuk, I., Tsymbal, Y., Ptashnik, M., Ilchuk, R., Martyniuk N. Efficiency of control of segetal vegetation in oats in organic agriculture. Agriculture and Plant Sciences: Theory and Practice, (1), 17–23. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.54651/ agri.2022.01.02.
22. McGeoch, M. A., Butchart, S. H. M., Spear, D., Marais, E., Kleynhans, E. J., Symes, A., Chanson, J., Hoffmann, M. Global indicators of biological invasion: Species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Divers. Distrib. 2010, 16, 95–108.
23. Pinke G., Pal R., Botta-Dukat Z. Effects of environmental factors on weed species composition of cereal and stubble fields in western Hungary. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2010, 5, 283–292.
24. Pszczółkowski. Effect of mechanical and herbicide treatments on weed densities and biomass in two potato cultivars. Agriculture 2020, 10, 455.
25. Саук О. Ф., Троященко Р. М., Павлюк І. О. Видовий склад бур’янового компоненту агроценозу картоплі. Вісник Полтавської державної академії. 2019. 1. С. 35–40.
26. Sawicka B., Krochmal-Marczak B., Barbaś P., Pszczółkowski P., Ćwintal M. Biodiversity of weeds in fields of grain in South-Eastern Poland. Agriculture. 2020, 10, 589.
27. Sekutowski T., Smagacz J. Share of anthropophytes in the crop sequence: Winter wheat-Maize-Spring wheat depending on tillage system. Acta Agrobot. 2014, 67, р. 117–122.
28. Smagacz J. Conservation Soil Tillage-Tendencies and Importance in Contemporary Agriculture. Monografie i Rozprawy Naukowe; IUNG-PIB Puławy: Puławy, Poland, 2018; Volume 59, p. 126.
29. Сторчоус І. Топ-8 найбільш шкодочинних зимуючих бур’янів в посівах зернових. Захист рослин. 2020. https://www.agronom.com.ua/top-8-najbilsh-shkodochynnyh- zymuyuchyh-bur-yaniv-u-posivah-zernovyh.
30. Сикало О. О., Скилаб О. О., Чернега Т. О. Карантинні бур’яни. Національний університет біоресурсів і природокористування України. 2015. http://dglib. nubip.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/3264/1/Sukalo_ Karantunni_byrynu.pdf.
31. Thomas, A.G., Derksen, D.A., Blackshaw, R.E., Van Acker, R.C., Légère, A., Watson, P.R., Turnbull, G.C. A multistudy approach to understanding weed population shifts in medium- to long-term tillage systems. Weed Sci. 2017, 52, 874–880.
32. Tokhtar, V. K. Advanced Approaches to the Visualization of Data Characterizing Distribution Features of Alien Plant Species. Russ. J. Biol. Invasions 2018, 9, 263–269.
33. Verheles P. Control of corn pollution in the conditions of the rightbank forest steppe. Захист рослин. № 27. 2022. 110–127. DOI: 10.37128/2707-5826-2022-4-9. 34. Weber Е., Gut D. A survey of weeds that are increasingly spreading in Europe. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2005, 25 (1),109–121. ffhal-00886262f DOI: 10.1051/agro:2004061.
35. Wojciechowski W., Sowiński J. Changes in the number of weed seeds in soil under different tillage systems of winter wheat. Ournal of Plant Protection Research 2005, 45(2). 83–92.
36. Землеробство. Підручник. За редакцією Гидзя В. П. Центр учбової літератури. Київ. 2010. 464 с.
37. Zimdahl R. L. Weed-crop competition: a review. 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA. 220 pp.