Yield of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) depending on inoculation and fertilizer in the conditions of Transcarpathia of Ukraine

Keywords: common beans, variety, mineral fertilizers, inoculation, Rhizobophyte, yield, protein content

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to establish the peculiarities of the formation of productivity of beans of Mavka, Perlyna, Nadiya varieties depending on the norm of mineral fertilizers application and seed inoculation on sod-podzolic soils of Transcarpathia of Ukraine. Methods. The study was performed in a separate department of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine “Mukachevo Vocational College” in the Transcarpathian region. The field experiment was included in the stationary field crop rotation of the college on sod-podzolic heavy loam soils with a humus content of 1,9%. The experiment is three-factor, factor A – zoned medium-ripe varieties of common beans, factor B – rates of mineral fertilizers, calculated by the balance method for the planned harvest, factor C – inoculation of seeds. Results. It was found that inoculation of seeds provided an increase in grain yield from 1,3 to 16,3% depending on the variety and fertilizers It was noted that the higher the rate of fertilizer application, the lower the percentage increase in bean yield due to inoculation. Application of mineral fertilizers in the N90P60K30 norm without seed inoculation contributed to the increase of bean yield to 2,34 t/ha in Mavka variety, 2,45 t/ha in Perlyna variety and 2,15 t/ha in Nadiya variety. When inoculated with Rhizobophyte seeds, the higher yield of beans was formed by applying N60P40K20 fertilizers and reached 2,54 t/ha in Mavka variety, 2,63 t/ha in Perlyna variety and 2,36 t/ha in Nadiya variety. Conclusions. On sod-podzolic heavy loam soils of Transcarpathia for combination of inoculation of seeds with Rhizobophyte (200 g/ha) and mineral fertilizers in the norm N60P40K20 medium-ripe varieties Perlyna and Mavka form yields above 2,5 t/ha.

References

1. Овчарук О., Іванюк С. Квасоля – цінне джерело рослинного білка, зумовлене сортовими особливостями. Продовольча індустрія АПК. 2015. № 1/2. С. 38–40.
2. Рожкован В. Скромное обаяние фасоли. Зерно. 2014. № 4. С. 94–100.
3. Шляхтуров Д. Особливості формування продуктивності квасолі залежно від технології вирощування в умовах північного Степу : автореф. дис. … канд. с.-г. наук. Київ, 2009. 19 с.
4. Effect of seed inoculation and foliar fertilizing on structure of soybean yield and yield structure in western Polissya of Ukraine / N. Novytska, G. Gadzovskiy, B. Mazurenko, I. Svistunova, O. Martynov. Agronomy Research. 2020. Vol. 18. Iss. 4. P. 2512–2519. URL: https://doi.org/10.15159/ar.20.203.
5. Біологічний азот / В. Патика, С. Коць, В. Волкогон та ін. Київ : Світ, 2003. 424 с.
6. Abebe G. Effect of NP fertilizer and moisture conservation on the yield and yield components of haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the semi-arid zones of the Central Rift Valley in Ethiopia. Advances in Environmental Biology. 2009. Vol. 3. Iss. 3. Р. 302–307.
7. A note of the effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and Rhizobiumculture on growth and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) / R. Chandra, C. Rajput, K. Singh et al. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences. 1987. Vol. 16. Iss. 1. Р. 145–147.
8. Dhatonde B., Nalamwar R. Effect of nitrogen and irrigation levels on yield and water use of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian Journal of Agronomy. 1996. Vol. 41. Iss. 2. P. 265–268.
9. Turuko M., Mohammed A. Effect of different phosphorus fertilizer rates on growth, dry matter yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). World Journal of Agricultural Research. 2014. Vol. 2. Iss. 3. P. 88–92. URL: https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-2-3-1.
10. Vinandan R., Prasad U. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on growth, yield, nitrogen uptake and water-use efficiency of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Indian Journal Agricultural Sciences. 1998. Vol. 67. Iss. 11. Р. 75–80.
11. Rana M., Datt N., Singh M. Effect of Rhizobiut culture in combination with organic and chemical fertilizers on rajmasll (Phaseolus vulgaris) under dry temperate conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2006. Vol. 76. Iss. 3. Р. 151–153.
12. Dubey Y., Datt N. Affectivity of Rhizobium legumnosarum phaseoli with nitrogenin Frenchbean (Phaseolus vulgaris) – wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping sequence. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2008. Vol. 78. Iss. 2. Р. 167–169.
13. Патика В., Поташова Л., Толкачов М. Селекція бульбочкових бактерій квасолі. Вісник аграрної науки. 2001. № 1. С. 54–57.
14. Чундерова А. Влияние эффективных штаммов клубеньковых бактерий на урожай и содержание протеина в зерне фасоли. Селекция, семеноводство и приемы возделывания фасоли. Орел, 1975. С. 192–195.
15. Шкатула Ю., Краєвська Л. Ефективність симбіотичної азотфіксації в агроценозах квасолі. Вісник Дніпропетровського аграрно-економічного університету. 2015. № 4(38). С. 73–76.
16. Доспехов Б. Методика полевого опыта. Москва : Агропромиздат, 1985. 351 с.
Published
2022-07-13
Section
MELIORATION, ARABLE FARMING, HORTICULTURE