Formation of yield and grain quality of modern varieties of winter wheat of different geographical origin

Keywords: productivity, adaptability, genotype, agrometeorological resources, grain quality.

Abstract

Purpose. Under the conditions of the zone of unstable moistening of the northeastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine, the goal was to study the ecological study of winter wheat varieties of different geographical origin. Assess the possibility of optimal use of agrometeorological resources. On their basis, to improve adaptive technologies for growing grain crops in a zone of unstable moisture. This will contribute to the growth of quantitative and qualitative indicators of productivity, gross grain harvest and increase sustainability in agriculture. Methods. Field experiments are supplemented by laboratory studies. Methods of mathematical statistics were used to process the obtained data. Statistical processing of yield data was carried out by the method of dispersion analysis using the Statistica for Windows, Microsoft Excel software package. Related observations, records and analyzes were carried out according to the "Methodology of the State Variety Testing of Agricultural Crops". Results. In ecological variety testing, the highest yield was obtained for varieties: Harmonika – 8.87 t / ha, rich – 8.82 t / ha of the Institute of Plant Industry named after. V.Ya. Yuryeva NAAS; Akhtyrchanka Yubileynaya – 8.48 t/ha, Vozdvizhenka – 8.38 t/ha Ivanovskaya Experimental Breeding Station of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of the National Academy of Sciences; Tsarevna – 9.46 t/ha, Ros – 8.85 t/ha, Generous Niva – 8.70 t/ha, Otrada – 8.67 t/ha, Legend of Belotserkovskaya – 8.14 t/ha of the Belotserkovskaya experimental breeding stations of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of the National Academy of Sciences; Filippovka – 8.28 t/ha, Quail – 8.03 t/ha of the Breeding and Genetic Institute – the National Center for Seed Science and Variety Research of the National Academy of Sciences; Bogdana – 8.94 t/ha, MIP Assol – 8.90 t/ha, MIP Dnepryanka – 8.54 t/ha, Trudovnitsa Mironovskaya – 8.46 t/ha, Podolyanka – 8.44 t/ha Myronivsky Institute of Wheat them. V.M. Crafts NAAN; Landscape – 9.58 t/ha, Singer Polesskaya – 8.94 t/ha, Stolichnaya – 8.20 t/ha NSC "Institute of Agriculture NAAS". In the conditions of 2020, the grain of winter wheat of most varieties is 2 and 3 classes in quality, respectively. On average, the varieties of the Ivanovskaya Experimental Breeding Station of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of the National Academy of Sciences were characterized by the highest quality, where the content of protein and gluten was 13, 3 and 26.4%, respectively. indicators. The lowest indicators of grain quality by variety were noted at the Belotserkovskaya Experimental Breeding Station of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet at the level of protein 12.4% and gluten 23.5%. Conclusions. Under the conditions of the zone of unstable moistening of the northeastern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine, the processes of formation of the level of productivity and quality of grain by varieties of winter wheat were studied. An assessment was made of the resistance of the tested genotypes to specific weather conditions of the growing season. Varieties (different in origin) with high adaptive potential were identified. Under such conditions, the following varieties provided the highest level of individual productivity: Landscape, Tsarevna, Pivanka Polesskaya, Bogdana, MIP Assol, Harmonika, Ros, Sdobnaya, Schedraya Niva, Otrada, MIP Dnepryanka, Akhtyrchanka Yubileynaya, Trudovnitsa Mironovskaya, Podolyanka, Vozdvizhenka.

References

1. Tsenov N., Kostov K., Gubatov T,. Peeva V. Study on the genotype x environment interaction in winter wheat varieties. I Grain quality, Field Crop Studies, 2004. Vol. 1. P. 20-29.
2. Donmez E., Sears R.G., Shroyer J.P., Paulsen G.M. Genetic Gain in Yield Attributes of Winter Wheat in the Great Plains. Crop Science, 2001. Vol. 41. P. 1412-1419.
3. Ma B.L., Yan W., Dwyer L.M., Fregeau-Reid J., Voldeng H.D., Dion Y., Nass H. Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield, Agronomy Journal, 2004. Vol. 96. P. 169-180.
4. Girma K., Holtz St.L., Arnall D.B., Fultz L.M., Hanks Tr.L., Lawles K.D., Mack Cl.J., Owen K.W., Reed St.D., Santillano J. Weather, Fertilizer, Previous Year Yield, and Fertilizer Levels Affect Ensuing Year Fertilizer Response of Wheat. Agronomy Journal, 2007. Vol. 99. P. 1607-1614.
5. Fallahi H.A., Nasseri A., Siadat A. Wheat Yield Effect of Some Agronomy Practices on Main Traits of Grain Yield in Winter Wheat… 564 Components are Positively Influenced by Nitrogen Application under Moisture Deficit Environments. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 2008. Vol. 10. P. 673-676.
6. Tsenov N., Atanasova D., Todorov I., Dochev V. Environmental effect on common winter wheat productivity, In: Modern Variety Breeding for Present and Future Needs (Eds. J. Prohens & M.L. Badenes), Proceedings of the 18th EUCARPIA General Congress, 9-12 September, Valencia, Spain, 2008. P. 480-484.
7. Lazaro L., Abbate P.E., Cogliatti D.H., Andrade F.H. Relationship between yield, growth and spike weight under phosphorus deficiency and shading. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2010. Vol. 148. P. 83-93.
8. Brancourt-Hulmel M., Lecomte C. Effect of Environmental Varieties on Genotype x Environment Interaction of Winter Wheat: A Comparison of Biadditive Factorial Regression to AMMI. Crop Science, 2003. Vol. 43. P. 608–617.
9. Kolev T.J., Yanev Sh. Investigation of durum wheat varieties under soil and climatic environments of the Plovdiv region. Plant Science, 2004. Vol. 41. P. 244-247. 10. Koteva V.P. Investigation on yield stability of wheat variety Miryana in different fertilizing levels. Balkan scientific conference “Breeding and cultural practices of the crops”, Karnobat, 2005. P. 443-447.
11. Собко М.Г. Продуктивність сортів пшениці ози- мої залежно від строків сівби в умовах північної частини лівобережного Лісостепу України. Вісник Полтавської державної аграрної академії. 2014. № 1. С. 6-9.
12. Zhang Y., Zhang Y., He Z., Ye G. Milling quality and properties of autumn-sown Chinese wheats evaluated through multi-location trials. Euphytica, 2005. Vol. 143. P. 209-222.
13. Roozeboom K.L., Shapaugh W.T., Tuinstra M.R., Vanderlip R.L., Milliken G.A. Testing Wheat in Variable Environments: Genotype, Environments, Interaction Effects, and Grouping Test Locations, Crop Science, 2008. Vol. 48. P. 317-330.
14. Williams R.M., O’Brien L., Eagles H.A., Solah V.A., Jayasena V. The influence of genotype, environment, and genotype x environment interaction on wheat quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008. Vol. 59. P. 95-111.
15. Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта. Москва. Колос, 1985. 415 с.
16. Методика проведення експертизи та державного випробування сортів рослин зернових, крупяних та зернобобових культур. Державна служба з охорони прав на сорти рослин. 2003. № 2(3). 2014 с.
17. Царенко О.М., Злобін Ю.А., Скляр В.Г., Панченко С.М. Комп’ютерні методи в агрономії та с.-г. біології. Суми. Університетська книга, 2000. 203 с.
Published
2022-05-23
Section
MELIORATION, ARABLE FARMING, HORTICULTURE