Soil Degradation as a Result of Military Conflicts: Global Experience and Implications for Ukraine

Keywords: land reclamation; food security; phytoremediation; ecosystem approach; sustainable land management; post-war recovery

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of this study is to analyse the consequences of the decline or loss of soil fertility caused by military operations and to assess their impact on agricultural production, food security, and the socio-economic stability of rural areas. Particular attention is given to highlighting the interconnections between land degradation and the associated risks of intensified conflict-related factors in the post-war period.
Methods. The study employs an interdisciplinary approach combining systemic and structural analysis, synthesis of analytical research by international organisations, and comparative analysis of environmental restoration practices. Methods of logical generalisation and analytical grouping of factors influencing agricultural production and socio-economic processes were applied. The research also evaluates the potential application of physical, chemical, and biological methods for the reclamation of soils contaminated as a result of military activities in the context of post-war recovery.
Results. It has been established that the consequences of military operations include the mechanical destruction of the fertile soil layer and reduced water and air permeability, the accumulation of toxic contaminants, and disruption of microbiological balance. Such impacts lead to a reduction in the area of land suitable for agricultural cultivation and create long-term risks to food security. The study sub-stantiates the main groups of factors that may contribute to social instability, resource scarcity, forced migration, increased inequality, and weakened institutional control in territories affected by military activities resulting in soil contamination. The analysis and synthesis of international experience confirm the effectiveness of a comprehensive approach to land reclamation, combining physical, chemical, and biological methods, as well as the conservation of contaminated areas alongside strategic resource-use planning.
Conclusions. The post-war restoration of land fertility should be considered an integral component of a long-term environmental and economic strategy. The implementation of a comprehensive approach that combines scientifically grounded reclamation methods with community involvement in land restoration processes will contribute not only to the primary objective of restoring soil fertility but also to strengthening food security and fostering a resilient social environment in the context of post-war recovery.

References

1. Виникнення чорнозему: історія та значення для аграріїв. АгроЕліта. URL: https://agroelita.info/ vynyknennia-chornozemu-istoriia-ta-znachennia-dlia-ahrariiv (дата звернення: 24.02.2026).
2. From conflict to peacebuilding: The role of natural resources and the environment. Nairobi : United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2009.
3. Land degradation, poverty and inequality. Bonn : United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), 2019.
4. World population prospects 2024. New York : United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2024. URL: https://population.un.org/wpp
5. Barbut M., Alexander S. Land degradation as a security threat amplifier. In: Land restoration: Reclaiming landscapes for a sustainable future. Bonn : United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), 2016.
6. Ahmadnia S. et al. Defueling conflict: Environment and natural resource management as a pathway to peace. Washington : World Bank Group, 2024.
7. Natural resources and conflict: A guide for mediation practitioners. Nairobi : United Nations Department of Political Affairs (UN DPA), 2015.
8. The role of natural resources in disarmament, demobilization and reintegration. Nairobi : United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) ; United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2013.
9. The global land outlook. Bonn : United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), 2017.
10. Elbein S. Parks for peace: Managing transboundary protected areas. National Geographic. 2022.
11. Hsiao A. Building cross-border collaboration through biodiversity corridors. Peace Review. 2010. Vol. 22, No 2. P. 123–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2010.483527
12. The land in numbers: Livelihoods at a tipping point. Bonn : United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), 2014.
13. The cascading and compounding impacts of drought. Bonn : United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), 2023.
14. Nellemann C. (ed.). The rise of environmental crime: A growing threat to natural resources, peace, development and security. Nairobi : United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) ; INTERPOL, 2016.
15. Clement V., Rigaud K. Groundswell Part 2: Acting on internal climate migration. Washington : World Bank, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/36248
16. Sida L., Mooney E. Independent review of the humanitarian response to internal displacement. London : Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute, 2024.
17. Verme P., Schuettler K. The impact of forced displacement on host communities: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Development Economics. 2020. Vol. 146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102606
18. Fricska S., Huggins C., Unruh J. Toolkit and guidance for preventing and managing land and natural resources conflict. New York : United Nations Interagency Framework Team for Preventive Action, 2012.
19. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. Paris : United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), 1994.
20. Nature-based solutions for peace. Nairobi : United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2024.
21. Morales-Muñoz J. et al. Alternative livelihoods and ecological restoration: Community responses. Bogotá : Global Environmental Research Network, 2023.
22. Berkes F. et al. Sustainable livelihoods and community-based conservation. London : Routledge, 2009.
23. Conca K. Environmental peacebuilding in practice: Pathways and dilemmas. Geneva : International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), 2024.
24. Land and conflict: Lessons from the field. Nairobi : United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), 2018.
Published
2026-05-06
Section
MELIORATION, ARABLE FARMING, HORTICULTURE